NYTimes: Defining non-binary work wear
Andrew Hansen
What to wear to knock 'em dead at the office while confounding heterodox gender binarisms.
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 62 | January 11, 2023 9:58 PM |
Why does everyone have that fusilli pasta hair?
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | January 10, 2023 5:30 AM |
The NYT has become increasingly ridiculous over the last 5 years.
| by Anonymous | reply 2 | January 10, 2023 5:37 AM |
Reading that article and seeing those clothes reminded me of this SNL sketch from several years ago.
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 4 | January 10, 2023 5:50 AM |
Walking into such an office and seeing this I would have major qualms doing business with such an organization
| by Anonymous | reply 5 | January 10, 2023 5:50 AM |
That guy is hot regardless of what he wears
| by Anonymous | reply 6 | January 10, 2023 5:55 AM |
Nobody wears any of this genderless shit in a corporate office. It's a stupid article about something that doesn't exist.
| by Anonymous | reply 7 | January 10, 2023 5:57 AM |
I find NB to be the height of ridiculous: We are ALL nonbinary! No one's gender affectations (or whatever) are all male or all female. There's always a crossover. Always.
However, I'd have zero issue if someone - male or female or whatever - wore the outfit in the pic OP posted. It's professional looking.
| by Anonymous | reply 8 | January 10, 2023 6:01 AM |
As long as clothes are clean, in crisp shape, fit well and are not "LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME!" clothes (and most of these fit that description very well--they're mostly in neutral colors), I'm fine with them.
| by Anonymous | reply 10 | January 10, 2023 7:58 AM |
As if they had a job to begin with.
| by Anonymous | reply 12 | January 10, 2023 8:55 AM |
[quote] Togas and robes.
but not during business hours
Professionalism is necessary if you expect to be taken seriously
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 13 | January 10, 2023 8:59 AM |
JFC. The NY Times is a joke.
| by Anonymous | reply 14 | January 10, 2023 9:03 AM |
βGo be non-binary on your own time!β
| by Anonymous | reply 15 | January 10, 2023 9:03 AM |
Non-binary attire for mandatory early retirement:
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 16 | January 10, 2023 9:08 AM |
The NYT fucking can't get enough of these shapeless, formless, fuckless, sexless, ugly motherfuckers.
| by Anonymous | reply 17 | January 10, 2023 10:06 AM |
[quote] The NYT fucking can't get enough of these shapeless, formless, fuckless, sexless, ugly motherfuckers.
The writer and the immediate editor probably just wear The Gap
πβπππ π'πππππ ππ π π€πππ‘ππ, πππππππππ, π£ππππ πππππ, πππ βππππ ππ₯π’ππ πππ£πππ ππ π΅ππππππ¦π, ππ. π»ππ π€πππ‘πππ πππ π£πππππ βππ£π ππππ ππππ‘π’πππ ππ πβπ πππ€ ππππ πππππ π€πππ ππ‘π, π πππππππ¦29, πππ π΄ππ‘πππ€π πππ€ ππππ. π»π πππ βππ π€πππ βππ£π ππππππππ πππ π‘πππ ππ‘ π½ππ'π ππ’π, π‘βπ πΏπππππ πβπππ‘ππ, π‘βπ πππππβπ‘ πΆππ‘ππ§πππ π΅ππππππ πβπππ‘ππ, πππ ππ‘ π‘ππ ππππ¦ πππ¦ ππππ πππ ππ’πππ π·πΌπ ππππ‘π¦ π πππππ π‘π πππ π‘ βπππ. π»π βππ π‘ππ’πππ ππ₯π‘πππ ππ£πππ¦ ππ π‘βπ π.π. πππ πΈπ’ππππ π£ππ βππ ππ’π ππππ ππππ πππ πβπππ πβπππ. π»π βππ π πππ¦ππππππ πππππ π·π’π π‘π¦, π πππ‘ πππππ πππππ, πππ π πππ£πππ¦ ππππππ¦--πππ‘β πβππ ππ πππ ππ¦ πππππ--ππ π‘βπ πΊππππ‘ ππππ€ππ π‘, πππ ππ π€βππ βπ πππ£ππ π πππππ‘ ππππ.
| by Anonymous | reply 18 | January 10, 2023 10:25 AM |
One would think that their crippling fibromyalgia would prevent them from working and thus any concerns about attire.
| by Anonymous | reply 19 | January 10, 2023 10:40 AM |
Corsets and other foundational garments are also non-binary; the model in OP needs to look into that.
| by Anonymous | reply 20 | January 10, 2023 10:41 AM |
Hideous first pic. And I'm sure it only gets worse from there.
| by Anonymous | reply 22 | January 10, 2023 11:15 AM |
Finally! After the mistakes of the Iraq War and the 2016 election, the NYT finally writes what the people are clamoring for!
| by Anonymous | reply 23 | January 10, 2023 11:41 AM |
The modelβs hair isnβt even a primary color. I think heβs a faker.
| by Anonymous | reply 25 | January 10, 2023 12:14 PM |
He looks like quite the stupid hipster dick.
| by Anonymous | reply 26 | January 10, 2023 12:30 PM |
[quote]Jesus wept.
He should have used more lube.
| by Anonymous | reply 27 | January 10, 2023 1:22 PM |
Loganβs Run gays, I love you.
| by Anonymous | reply 28 | January 10, 2023 2:33 PM |
I wear non binary clothes to work.
I wear a shimmering silver hoodie, cargo pants and crocs.
And I don't wash my hair in solidarity with cancer patients who have no hair.
| by Anonymous | reply 29 | January 10, 2023 2:39 PM |
The harsh truth is that nobody wants to fuck these attention-seeking cluster-B genderless freaks.
We know it. They know it.
Even the dog knows it.
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 31 | January 10, 2023 3:02 PM |
I'm amazed anyone who thinks they are non-binary has an actual job.
| by Anonymous | reply 33 | January 10, 2023 3:46 PM |
Remember when NB was called androgynous and no one talked or cared much about it?
βOh yeah - Jen? Yes, sheβs sort of androgynous.β And that was it - moved right onto the next subject.
NYTimes is so desperate.
| by Anonymous | reply 35 | January 10, 2023 3:53 PM |
It's Pat surely due a 30th anniversary release?
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 36 | January 10, 2023 4:43 PM |
I used to think, where do these people work? There canβt be enough record stores for all of them. Now that record stores no longer exist, they must all work in cannabis dispensaries.
| by Anonymous | reply 37 | January 10, 2023 4:49 PM |
We had a whole thread about how trans and nonbinaries work at Starbucks.
This whole attitude is ridiculous. "It's absolutely essential that everyone in the world knows I'm non-binary! How can I make it show with my clothes?"
| by Anonymous | reply 38 | January 10, 2023 5:08 PM |
[quote] Togas and robes.
"Togas and robes"??? [italic]HA!![/italic] Michael York is wearing a [italic]caftan![/italic]
| by Anonymous | reply 39 | January 10, 2023 6:19 PM |
Re: the author of this foolishness
[quote]πβπππ π'πππππ ππ π π€πππ‘ππ, πππππππππ, π£ππππ πππππ, πππ βππππ ππ₯π’ππ πππ£πππ ππ π΅ππππππ¦π, ππ. π»ππ π€πππ‘πππ πππ π£πππππ βππ£π ππππ ππππ‘π’πππ ππ πβπ πππ€ ππππ πππππ π€πππ ππ‘π, π πππππππ¦29, πππ π΄ππ‘πππ€π πππ€ ππππ. π»π πππ βππ π€πππ βππ£π ππππππππ πππ π‘πππ ππ‘ π½ππ'π ππ’π, π‘βπ πΏπππππ πβπππ‘ππ, π‘βπ πππππβπ‘ πΆππ‘ππ§πππ π΅ππππππ πβπππ‘ππ
R18 - Upright Citizens Brigade Theater. He's a comedian. Seriously he's a comedian. He's just shifted his work from the stage, to print.
And to save everyone time, I checked and this is absolutely the same guy.
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 40 | January 10, 2023 6:20 PM |
God, these people are exhausting to be around!
| by Anonymous | reply 41 | January 10, 2023 6:23 PM |
If non-binary define themselves, wouldn't they each have to define their own work wear? If someone else is doing it, wouldn't that be bigotry?
| by Anonymous | reply 42 | January 10, 2023 6:24 PM |
R40 My god. That was awful.
How the fuck does someone that untalented get published in the NYT? There was nothing in that strange stand-up performance that was funny or even slightly interesting. There were no punchlines or even a story arc. And what was the audience laughing at? Were they his friends and just being nice?
And is he doing drag or is that his regular non-binary day-to-day look? So many questions.
| by Anonymous | reply 43 | January 10, 2023 6:42 PM |
[quote]And what was the audience laughing at? Were they his friends and just being nice?
Copious amounts of pot, silly.
| by Anonymous | reply 44 | January 10, 2023 6:49 PM |
Good Lord, what FREAKS!
Straight people will never stop lapping up the Gender Identity Movement's backwash!
| by Anonymous | reply 45 | January 10, 2023 7:08 PM |
"πβπππ π'πππππ ππ π π€πππ‘ππ, πππππππππ, π£ππππ πππππ, πππ βππππ ππ₯π’ππ πππ£πππ ππ π΅ππππππ¦π, ππ."
Uh-oh... Someone didn't get the memo that the term "homosexual" is LitERaL vIOleNCe!!!
| by Anonymous | reply 46 | January 10, 2023 9:22 PM |
I don't understand the NYT's preoccupation with this stuff. This opinion piece was published today.
I mean, imagine if every piece on trans were replaced by a piece on some facet of economic inequality.
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 47 | January 10, 2023 11:46 PM |
Subtitle, how an attractive husky man makes himself an unattractive attention seeking clown.
| by Anonymous | reply 48 | January 11, 2023 12:44 AM |
We're in a Recession, Covid is back, flus are spreading like crazy, this winter is predicted to be awful, many states made abortion a crime, gas and energy bills are through the roof, basic necessities like food and toiletries are getting too high to afford, etc. Nobody wants to hear about this nonbinary nonsense anymore.
| by Anonymous | reply 49 | January 11, 2023 1:00 AM |
The NY Post has more substance than The NY Times today.
| by Anonymous | reply 50 | January 11, 2023 1:12 AM |
The Washington Post also has a reporter who's basically assigned to the trans/non-binary beat full-time (and seems to be non-binary herself so you don't exactly get objective reporting on it).
| by Anonymous | reply 51 | January 11, 2023 1:49 AM |
[quote] I don't understand the NYT's preoccupation with this stuff.
Better to fill space with this stuff than Joe stealing and hiding classified documents
| by Anonymous | reply 52 | January 11, 2023 1:50 AM |
I'm convinced this is all a distraction from the economic collapse about to ensue.
| by Anonymous | reply 53 | January 11, 2023 2:32 AM |
[quote]How the fuck does someone that untalented get published in the NYT?
You do wonder!
| by Anonymous | reply 54 | January 11, 2023 5:05 AM |
People who demand the power to "destroy gender" seem to be a little, you know, sick in the gunt.
| by Anonymous | reply 55 | January 11, 2023 2:54 PM |
Really hard-hitting, important reporting here. Time to cancel my NYT subscription.
| by Anonymous | reply 56 | January 11, 2023 2:58 PM |
The issue is not gender but gender roles and stereotypes. But the nonbinary crowd in fact reinforce every gender stereotype in the book. It's interesting how androgynous people never had much issues with their biological sex. Ones that did got sex changes. Many didn't care about the pronouns, in fact enjoyed being called both he/she. The point is, if you're androgynous just live your life as you want. Don't force others to adhere to your impossible standards.
| by Anonymous | reply 57 | January 11, 2023 3:03 PM |
Heβs appropriating South Asian attire at R40!
R56, good luck canceling your subscriptionβ you have to chew your arm off to get away from them.
| by Anonymous | reply 58 | January 11, 2023 3:29 PM |
Okay, guy or gal, youβve made your fashion statement. Now DO YOUR JOB.
| by Anonymous | reply 59 | January 11, 2023 4:29 PM |
Such non-binary folks likely spend a lot of time sashaying around the water cooler and coffee stand.
| by Anonymous | reply 60 | January 11, 2023 4:42 PM |
[quote]Really hard-hitting, important reporting here. Time to cancel my NYT subscription.
Iβm not a NYT subscriber, but wouldnβt this article be in the βfashion and lifestyleβ category, or was it actually on the front page?
| by Anonymous | reply 61 | January 11, 2023 5:13 PM |
R1 I made the Jerry out of fusili, because you're silly!
| by Anonymous | reply 62 | January 11, 2023 9:58 PM |