Jk Rowling stands with gays.
Christopher Lucas
R35 and a small sample of the cracked and hateful lunacy it shares here:
I am so DONE eating out. Consumer price index up 7.5%.
Corporate profits up 22%.
We need a revolution.
I am so DONE eating out. [quote]Duh! You all wanted a $15/hr min wage. This is what you get. Add a critical labor shortage (in service jobs) and wham!....$20 for eggs.
You're an idiot. Go actually read a little on the economics of the minimum wage, you Repug fool.
Jk Rowling stands with gays. Until the Transtapo can explain why being transracial or transpecies is any different than being transgender, they can fuck off.
And both queer and TERF are slurs, you homophobic and misogynistic assholes, so, fuck off again with both of those.
Jk Rowling stands with gays. [quote]hope she gets assaulted
[quote]and all old gays need to die off
Not the the transtapo is misogynistic or homophobic or anything, right?
What other actual minority groups can we get a bunch of straight white men with fetishes to dress up as to get all the attention and acquiescence that the transtapo has gotten in the last few years? I guess it really doesn't matter because they would just turn around and attack the very group they are pretending to be part of. Disloyalty, violence, and narcissism are their nature.
Jk Rowling stands with gays. The transtapo is 100% homophobic and misogynistic. Gay people weren't attacking other people to get our rights. We weren't stomping on other groups to get our rights. If your "rights" are dependent on attacking and erasing another group of people, you are in the wrong. Women exist and they are not men in dresses with penises. Gay people exist and they literally have nothing to do with men in dresses pretending to be women. (And vice versa for the supposed T men.)
Sex is binary. XX or XY. Gender is and always has been a spectrum from masculine to feminine. Wear your fucking dress and wig. That puts you in the feminine end of the spectrum according to the modern definitions of gender but it doesn't make you a woman.
If you put a baby on an island with nothing and it somehow survived and you came back 20 years later, a male baby you left there would still be male. A female baby would still be female. A gay baby would still be gay and a straight baby would still be straight. These are not mutable characteristics. They are innate. This T bullshit is making the left look like fucking morons who don't believe in science. I bet more than 75% of T are Repug straight men. Fucking regressive assholes.
Why are men's backsides so goddamn attractive? The only thing less attractive than a man's backside is his frontside.
Elliot Page is writing a memoir about his 'transgender journey' [quote]Why is gender changeable yet sexuality is not?
Neither is changeable, it's only the transtapo who believe sex is a mutable human characteristic. And, in doing so, they are complicit in supporting the gay conversion movement.
R66, what's the difference? Transing gays is just one of the ways used to create ex-gays. True or false, Ellen Page used to be a lesbian but is now no longer a lesbian. If you believe she is no longer a lesbian and is now just another straight man then you are a supporter of gay conversion therapy. Congrats, homophobes, you'd fit right in in Iran. Maybe you could take a vacation and help throw gay men off of buildings while wearing a dress.
Elliot Page is writing a memoir about his 'transgender journey' I can't wait to see her hairy chest! That should be entertaining.
It's kind of hilarious that, if she's taking testosterone, she started it right at the time most men start losing their head hair and uncontrollably growing it in their ears and nostrils. How does that work anyway with artificial hormones? Do they follow the same pattern of lessening levels of testosterone as actual men? I can't imagine how destructive it is for a woman to take supplemental testosterone in a high enough dose to make physical changes. That should be considered medical malpractice in and of itself.