It's naive to think that house symbolized Hollywood, and it was just a random symbolic attack on Hollywood.

I studied this case for many, many hours. Here are some very important anomalies:

1) Bugliosi was a corrupt prosecutor in Los Angeles, which is famous for prosecutorial misconduct. In the years after getting famous with his cover-up book "Helter Skelter", Bugliosi was revealed to be a raging pathological liar and an all around complete scumbag.

Bugliosi became convinced that his new child wasn't his, and that his wife must have had an affair with the milk man at the time of conception. Bugliosi used his government access to track down and stalk the former milk man. It was completely delusional, aggressive, corrupt behavior, and Bugliosi went to elaborate extremes to cover his tracks and weave a web of lies.

Around this same time (early 70s), Bugliosi impregnated his mistress, and beat the crap out of her after she refused to get the baby aborted. She called the cops, and it was all reported. Then Bugliosi broke into her house again and forced her to sign a statement saying that she lied about him beating her up. Bugliosi was running for state Attorney General at the time, and needed a clean record. Luckily these two stories of Bugliosi's scumbag behavior came out right before the election, and Bugliosi didn't get elected Attorney General of California.

Bugliosi went on many years later to write a huge book about the JFK assassination, defending the absurd official narrative. We know that Bugliosi was wildly corrupt and basically evil in his personal life, and we know that he was capable of weaving elaborate lies in his own personal life and legal affairs. We know that Bugliosi wrote a super-long book about JFK, a web of elaborate lies that defend the official narrative that Oswald was the lone assassination.

All of this means that Bugliosi is completely unreliable in regards to anything relating to the Manson Murders. His prosecutorial conduct is unreliable, and his best selling book about the Manson Murders is unreliable.

2) There are big clues about intelligence agencies and large-scale drug dealing written all over this case.

Sebring was ex-Navy, and his growing hair salon chain was financed in part by Sharon Tate's father, who was a military intelligence big shot (assistant chief of staff for intelligence at the Sixth Region Army Air Defense Command at Fort Baker). In fact, after the murders, Sharon's father opened up his own line of hair salons, called Tate Hair Emporium or something like that.

Sebring was a big-time drug dealer and a hair salon chain owner, financed by Tate the Army Intelligence big shot. Hair salons are cash-based businesses, so easy to launder lots of drug money. Look into Vidal Sassoon himself, he was a Mossad operative. The dumb movie Don't Mess With the Zohan dealt with this. Sassoon was also an heir to the Sassoon family that ran the opium trade in China. So powerful that they got the British Army to fight The Opium Wars for them.

Folger was an heiress to the Folgers coffee fortune, and her family were obviously elites within the US establishment and secret societies. They were members of Bohemian Grove, and they started a separate secret society when they felt Bohemian Grove was getting too crowded or common.

Folger Coffee did huge business in Vietnam, and their corporate/land interests were a consideration in the Vietnam War. Also, the US Army was importing tons of heroin from Vietnam, inside body bags and Army planes. Folger's Coffee bags would have also made ideal transportation concealment.

Abby Folger's boyfriend Frykowski was a big-time drug dealer, just like Sebring. And in Polanski's police interrogation, available on Youtube, Polanski notes that back in Poland Frykowski's guardian or mentor was the #1 intelligence agency figure in Poland. Frykowski had extremely deep intelligence agency ties.

(to be continued)