I finally spoke to my friend who is a reporter, I struck gold, she has a friend at one of the papers who ran the false version of the story, about GM, the woman and the son. He had some interesting information about it, these are facts from one that knows what happened, one of the involved, this is what he said. Its all of the books and only mentioned to my friend, but it gives some valuable insights into what some nutters rely on as fact and authority to spread lies and insults.

The reason for publishing an article based on a few facts but mostly built on lies, to purposely target some specific individuals, is what some less credible papers or reporters might do when a person refuses to talk or give them what they want and it is about a major story, like this one. The goal for the paper is to make such damage to and upset the person enough to make them come forward and defend themselves and the ones involved by setting the faulty information right, meaning, they get them to TALK and the papers get their major story. That is the reason for why it was published and the level of truth to it or more the lack of truth to it.

He also said that several papers had during a long time tried to get the woman to talk, by persistence, a HUGE amount of money, six figures in pounds, stalking, but nothing has made her give them what they want. And publishing that consciously made up lies about the story between her and GM failed too, talk about loyal. She is the only one that has proven not to be for sale or any interested in fame, and not being in it for the megastar, limelight or money, only for George. She had since 1997 to do otherwise if she wanted to. It is not too far a stretch to say it's obvious who told her how to stand her ground.

One of the papers had, in a shady way, bribe or something, got hold of a copy of a genuine DNA test showing strong favour of paternity 99,99..., performed by a highly respected laboratory in the UK. When the lab was approached by other papers the test was confirmed but protected by secrecy laws. The woman was asked for permissions for the papers to access the information, but she denied every time. The shady way it was obtained by the paper and her refusal to give them permission to any access is why the papers could not officially confirm the test.

The papers knew the so-called family member referred to would not be able to confirm anything about it for several reasons, that was only used to provide a false sense of truth to the public, who the tabloids know well is surprisingly sure George Michael, as a grown man told his father and sisters about everyone he slept with, or even more, someone he actually loved, he didn´t tell them about Anselmo eighter, he seems to have kept his true loves to himself, and the papers used it all in order to achieve the real purpose of the lies. To get her to come forward and give them their story.

To use some well-chosen phrase about George Michaels sexual preferences gave some extra points, they know that for each one, you can find several where he claims differently, it is all about their desire how to angle it to fit their purposes, like they also know GM never would have told the full truth about his sex life to tabloids or complete strangers, who would, he didn't say a word about it until he was forced to, he never gave more then he had to about it, same things over and over, but nothing more, and even that was too much for a lot of people to accept, to think he would ever be considering telling more, or everything about it, is calling him stupid.

At the end of the original article, removed in every other paper that followed, at the very bottom of the paper claiming over and over that the woman says... it clearly stated -The woman does not comment on her private life.

This was a sad attempt by the tabloids to treat the woman and the son as bad as they treated GM while he was alive. Let us be wiser and show it in the New Year.