Bruce Weber: Serial Predator
Christopher Lucas
More models have joined the chorus of accusations against photographer Bruce Weber.
Weber — who has shot for Vogue and Abercrombie & Fitch — was sued by model Jason Boyce in December 2017, alleging sexual harassment and discrimination.
In January, 15 models spoke with the New York Times, describing “unnecessary nudity and coercive sexual behavior.”
Now, five more models, represented by Lisa Bloom, anonymously filed suit in the Southern District of New York Friday, claiming Weber is a “serial sexual predator” who “exploited his prominence and influence to manipulate men into submitting to his sexual advances.
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 15 | January 3, 2019 11:41 AM |
All of the victims describe a similar “modus operandi,” saying Weber would do a “breathing exercise” that would lead to him fondling their genitals.
Weber allegedly said things like, “Just relax and you’ll go far in this industry.”
Weber’s lawyer tells us, “These new allegations are outrageous. Bruce Weber has never lured, recruited or forced anyone to do anything and has never inappropriately touched a model. This lawsuit is nothing more than a media-hungry lawyer’s attempt to extort Mr. Weber.”
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | December 22, 2018 6:19 AM |
“There was a formula. It was male models from the Midwest, ages 18 to 26. He would never go after big models. He went after the ones who were naive and broke, so they couldn’t sue,” an insider told us.
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | December 22, 2018 6:20 AM |
Anybody on DL have personal experience with Weber?
Or similar experiences?
| by Anonymous | reply 4 | December 22, 2018 6:21 AM |
Is he that obviously gay photographer who's married to a woman?
| by Anonymous | reply 5 | December 22, 2018 6:24 AM |
Unnecessary nudity in an Abercrombie & Fitch ad?
whodathunkit
| by Anonymous | reply 6 | December 22, 2018 6:27 AM |
But he is straight! He is married to a WOMAN!!!!!
| by Anonymous | reply 7 | December 22, 2018 7:16 AM |
MALE MODEL is synonymous with WHORE, anyway.
| by Anonymous | reply 8 | December 22, 2018 7:24 AM |
Sacrificing for one’s Art:
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 9 | December 22, 2018 7:32 AM |
‘Unnecessary nudity?” What’s that?
| by Anonymous | reply 10 | December 22, 2018 7:44 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
Offsite Link| by Anonymous | reply 11 | January 3, 2019 11:01 AM |
Weber must have lots of photos like that on his cellphone.
| by Anonymous | reply 12 | January 3, 2019 11:25 AM |
Meh. The real surprise is that anyone is surprised. This old guy was taking the most beautiful photographs of beautiful boys - that was his thing! And they were so beautiful - and the shots were so intimate - how could anyone not think that this old guy wasn’t completely enamoured of these young gods? And that he wouldn’t ever touch...
And as someone pointed out - it was the fresh meat from out in the sticks who were powerless to do anything - if they wanted the gig...
So did many of the beautiful young men in his stable go on to have actual careers modeling for other photographers? Or did any of them manage to snag sugar daddies and live well before the inevitable march of time favilotates their return home to the Midwest? There must be plenty of stories out there...?
| by Anonymous | reply 14 | January 3, 2019 11:33 AM |
R11 now we get to the bottom of the story.
"RAPE!!! Bruce Weber touched my dick after I sent him a dozen pictures of it!! Where's my money?"
| by Anonymous | reply 15 | January 3, 2019 11:41 AM |